🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where African descendants are compensated to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to remove Black history and experience from the historical documents is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month represents how little it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the history when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.